Tham khảo Độc quyền cưỡng chế

  1. 1 2 Greenspan, Alan, Antitrust Lưu trữ 2005-12-17 tại Wayback Machine, in Capitalism:The Unknown Ideal by Ayn Rand. Also The Question of Monopolies Lưu trữ 2005-10-24 tại Wayback Machine by Nathaniel Branden defines and discusses coercive monopoly.
  2. “Lawrence Kudlow”. Jewish World Review. 14 tháng 6 năm 2000.
  3. Demirdjian, Z S Andrew; Zara, Mokatsian (2012). “The Maligned Image Of Monopoly”. ASBBS Proceedings. San Diego: American Society of Business and Behavioral Sciences. 19 (1): 236–240. ProQuest 1445143081.
  4. Richman, Sheldon (27 tháng 6 năm 2012). “Can Mutually Beneficial Exchanges Be Exploitative?”. FEE.
  5. 1 2 Hasnas, John (1998). “The Normative Theories of Business Ethics: A Guide for the Perplexed”. Business Ethics Quarterly. 8 (1): 19–42. doi:10.2307/3857520. JSTOR 3857520. S2CID 44030310.
  6. Branden, Nathaniel, ''The Question of Monopolies Lưu trữ 2005-10-24 tại Wayback Machine, from The Objectivist Newsletter (June 1962)
  7. Rothbard, Murray, The State Versus Liberty in The Ethics of Liberty by Rothbard (1982)
  8. Posner, Richard A. Natural Monopoly and Its Regulation (ISBN 1-882577-81-7).
  9. Behr, Edward (1996). Prohibition: Thirteen Years that Changed America. Arcade Publishing. tr. 189. ISBN 9781559703567.
  10. Greenspan, Alan, Antitrust Lưu trữ 2005-12-17 tại Wayback Machine, in Capitalism:The Unknown Ideal by Ayn Rand. Also The Question of Monopolies Lưu trữ 2005-10-24 tại Wayback Machine by Nathaniel Branden defines and discusses coercive monopoly.
  11. United States v. Alcoa, 148 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1945)
  12. Gal, Michal S. (tháng 3 năm 2004). “Monopoly Pricing as an Antitrust Offense in the U.S. and the EC: Two Systems of Belief about Monopoly?”. The Antitrust Bulletin. 49 (1–2): 343–384. doi:10.1177/0003603X0404900109. S2CID 55640455. SSRN 700863. ProQuest 201064375.
  13. Simpson, Brian P. (tháng 8 năm 2010). “Two Theories of Monopoly and Competition: Implications and Applications”. The Journal of Applied Business and Economics. 11 (2): 139–151. ProQuest 815978228.
  14. “High-Tech Robber Barons:”, Globalization and Postmodern Politics, Pluto Press, tr. 51–66, truy cập ngày 6 tháng 11 năm 2022
  15. Reed, Lawrence W. (1 tháng 3 năm 1980). “Witch-hunting For Robber Barons: The Standard Oil Story”. FEE.
  16. Heery, Edmund; Noon, Mike (2002). A Dictionary of Human Resources Management. Oxford University Press. tr. 225.
  17. Lindblom, Charles E. (1958). “Are Labor Unions Monopolies”. Challenge. 6 (5): 26–31. doi:10.1080/05775132.1958.11468630. JSTOR 40717821.